On April 17, the Court of Appeals, in a unanimous decision, finally restored common law negligence as a cause of action for commencing a suit against the owner(s) of a domestic animal that injures a ...
Surely you noticed the centrality of the notion of a product being “unreasonably dangerous,” right? And surely, Pennsylvania jury instructions must explain what that notion means, right? Wrong.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback